Dear all, here is the paragraph that made me confused:
"What could be more powerful than the essence of life? Is the mighty oak mightier than the acorn from which it sprang? More visible, yes. More powerful? Do you really think so? That which is invisible is more powerful than that which is visible. The Source of manifestation outdoes the manifestation any day."
And here is the point that I could not get:
"That which is invisible is more powerful than that which is visible. "
As if it is contradicting the previous oak example. I could not figure it out.
Is visible stronger than invisible : IS THAT THE POINT?
Invisible is stronger than visible..