NO:2576 QUESTION..
Dear all, here is the paragraph that made me confused:
"What could be more powerful than the essence of life? Is the mighty oak mightier than the acorn from which it sprang? More visible, yes. More powerful? Do you really think so? That which is invisible is more powerful than that which is visible. The Source of manifestation outdoes the manifestation any day."
And here is the point that I could not get:
"That which is invisible is more powerful than that which is visible. "
As if it is contradicting the previous oak example. I could not figure it out.
Is visible stronger than invisible : IS THAT THE POINT?
OR
Invisible is stronger than visible..
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooove
engin
Dear engin, The second
Dear engin,
The second statement is the right one :
INVISIBLE IS STRONGER THAN VISIBLE
And there's to me no contradiction with the previous oak example !
For this example starts with a question which holds its own answer :
"Is the mighty oak mightier than the acorn from which it sprang?"... The answer is : "Not at all" of course. The oak is just more visible but the acorn holds the essence of the oak, which makes the acorn stronger for the oak can't help giving new acorns at the end...
Blessings and much love to you,
CCMountain
Thank you dear France Ten
Thank you dear France :thumbup:
Ten points from my heart :thumbup:
I think the structure of the sentence had made me a bit confused ;)
Now I am supported and clear.
much love to you toooooo :wub:
Engin