Here I am replying in the guise of two wonderful imagined women who pretend they don't get it.

And to top it all, let's hear what deep wisdom Jochen, that waft of self-designed hologram, has to add. He says:

Let's try to keep very close to this Heavenletter, as close as we can afford. The first paragraph (emphasis mine):

You are going to make a discovery today, a lovely discovery. You will see. You will have an insight. This insight will be like a revelation to you. This revelation will open you to a new world of your making. One little spark of light in your mind, and a whole new world appears before you. Because you become open, a whole new vista opens.

As far as I can see, it does not aske me to fetch a Jochen opener and open myself. It says that I'm going to be open and that it could be today. And when I happen to be open, presumably by (wittingly or unwittingly) desiring it, there will be an insight that is a revelation, and revealed will be a new world that is of my making. This, I feel, leaves no room for interpretation; and where would it need interpretation?

It would seem to need interpretation as long as I take it for granted that the world happened to me, but as this Heavenletter says, that is not the case, for when your view changes, so does the world. The world is in your keeping, beloveds. The world is of your making. The world follows your perception of it.

So the world is as I see it, and once I happen to be open, I will see differently from that openness, and hence the world will be different. It's not that the world is this way or that. Your thoughts made it so. So, Emilia, I think you are perfectly right wen you say that "we love perception through the senses." But from this Heavenletter, where would "laws of energy" com from, where would the imperative that "we have to learn to master them" come from? Could it be they don't exist but are age-old hearsay? God says: This is why you want original rather than inherited thoughts, original thoughts rather than bought thoughts, original thoughts rather than pasted-on thoughts. It seems to me that this goes far beyond anything we have dared to envison so far. I feel God is asking us to at least allow for the possibility that all of what we have been thinking in terms of making sense of existence may be tainted by our belief that the world happened to us. The old victim mind has so many faces. Everything that supposedly happens to me – this world, my character, a sunburn, overdone pasta (or risotto; we forgot risotto; I absolutely love risotto; rcently I had one with … oh, sorry) – is victim mind in action. And I feel God wants his children to really know that nothing, nothing is ever done to them or happens to them. Everyone, what is your original thought, truly your own though. Not learned, not adopted, not pasted on. Regardless of what it is, that's what the world needs.

Now be the true you and fashion the world after the noblest thoughts of the soul that you are.
...
This is doable.
…
You first.

Is there anything needing interpretation? It only needs to be taken in as deeply as we can right now, hoping for the moment where we open up. It has to come. It cannot not come.

I know you will come to the fore. An insight today will transfer you there.

Emilia, dear, could it be that the perception of separation is actually the only law of the material world? Could this be the genesis of the whole enchilada? Maybe our learning is really just an unlearning. Maybe the entire reason that we chose to perceive in this fashion is the love of it all, as you say. And maybe, just maybe, what we created from our illusory perception of separation will remain after our unlearning and be totally transformed by our love.

This is a wonderful way of summing it up, George thing.

Loving you,
Jochen thing

Oh, George, you old rascal, I love the things you say!

It is.
Incredibly, although your insight "seems" to be indipendent from what I wrote, it is applicable.
Yesterday I had to take notice too, once again, of your same fact: to be glued, body and mind, to that which I reject.

"Where you see fault, remove the fault from your own eye."
Can I remove the idea of fault, I seem to nurture and see in front of me, by my thoughts? This would mean to "make peace", to remove the idea of fault and guilt from my mind. But I seem not to be able to do so through my mind activity, which is to say through my right thinking.
I can just ask God to see beyond ego's awful guises. I can ask to see the light of Truth shining behind those faces, those words, those acts.
Give me sight, not better thoughts.

I love bold people, dearest Anco, you touch one of my more sensitive chords!
I am struggling with my mind and, maybe you are right, I come to judge it wrongly in the end. I fight with it when I should try to make peace with it, accepting its limits.
I will dare more, Anco, I will...I swear it to myself.
Thank you.

The mind pretends to be and do what the spirit is in the process of doing.
This comment is absolutly wonderful.

George

George, I hope God is using your voice to let me know that "I am quite good at it" and that He is pleased with my heart.
Thank you.
Emilia...blinking.

I feel the same way, Jochen! Thank you, Fx4.

Interestingly, in this Heavenletter you brought us to, I found a line that fit right in with the blog entry I was writing this morning. The blog entry will be so much more because of a quote from this Heavenletter. That synchronicity again. I knew this blog entry was missing something, and now Fx4's comment has provided what was missing! The blog entry is entitled Magnolia Miracle. It will go up in a little while.

Furthermore, I was inspired to post five or six quotations from this Heavenletter on Twitter.