Who Winds Up the World and Makes It Run

Heavenletter #3745 Published on: February 25, 2011
God said:

From the inner workings of your heart comes the outer play of life. Upon so much of your heart rests the world. The world is dependent upon you. The world takes a picture of your heart and shows it to you. If you truly wish to uplift the world, then uplift your heart. You have thought that your heart is dependent upon the world. To some degree that is true, yet the world begins with you. The world is your disciple, so to speak. You set the tone for the world. Sing a merry tune.

Of course, the world is dependent upon your thoughts, your moods, your love. Everything is dependent upon your love. You are dependent upon your love. Your love sets the course for the world. Your love is like the sun setting out every morning. Your love peeks over the horizon. What is so hard about sharing love and making it apparent in the world?

You have been holding back. You have been waiting for the world to fill you with love when it is you who is to fill the world with love. You are like a horse waiting for the carriage to move forward.

The resplendence of the world waits for you. The well-being of the world is your responsibility. Lay out a blanket of your love for the world. Open the shades of the world, and look upon it, and see that it is good.

You oil the gears of the world. More than that, the world does not exist without you. You are the spinner of the world. If the world were a loom, you are the weaver. If the world were a cloth, you are the one who sews the cloth. You are the cabinetmaker of the world. You are the artist and musician of it.

The world is not as you thought. It is the cushion you sit on, yet you are the maker of the cushion. You are the dance teacher of the Universe. You twirl the world. You show it how. You are the spinner at the spinning wheel. You are the nutrition of the world. You feed the world. You supply it with its wealth. You make the world happen, and happen it does. You report the world. You, the reporter, the describer of the world, are also its energizer.

The world contributes to your story, and yet you are the motivator of the world. True, the world is for you, and yet you are for the world. You are more for the world than the world is for you. Which came first? You or the world? The tale is that the world came first for you to inhabit it, as if there were time and sequence. The world was spread out for you. Yet who tends the vineyard? Who picks the grapes? Who eats them? Who spits out the seeds, or chews them, or decides to dry the grapes and call them raisins? Who winds up the world and makes it run?

Of course, your arrangement with the world is reciprocal. The light you shine on the world casts its light on you. The shadows you cast on the world cast their shadows on you. It is up to you to make the world harmonic. The world plays the tune you give it. Get up now and enjoin the world to make merry at no expense to anyone. Lay out a royal carpet. Make the world a nice place for everyone to walk on. Make the grass green and the sky blue. Make a rosy sun to shine on all.

This is how you make the world.

<< Point to the Stars
In the Middle of the Ocea... >>
Bookmark and Share
Read Comments

"Which came first? You or the world?"

On February 25th, 2011 Normand Bo... says:

"From the inner workings of your heart comes the outer play of life."

How far back and how far ahead can we go with such a beautiful utterance? Which came first? Us or the world? As if there were time and sequence, Genesis says that Earth and Heaven were created first and mankind came at the end of the process. Yet God, always careful with His use of terms like "space" and "time", prefers to use a stylistic device: "the world was spread out for you". But it is more than a stylistic device. It must be that the potential world was created simultaneously with the angelic human.

The first "world" spread out must have been very "etherical" corresponding to the human angel's state of heart. Gaia was probably at that time the real Garden of Eden. The human angel's heart was working in harmony with it's Creator and God's laws were ruling the Universe.

The instant the human angel had the thought of appropriating for himself the power of creation, of non sharing his power, of making the experience of a private mind and a private soul, the Universe must have reversed into Illusion becoming dense and dark, corresponding to the inner working of the human angel's dream of separation. The human angel locked himself out of the Garden of Eden then fell into darkness. He woke up then in a planet of illusion governed by the law of opposites which are the law of the physical world.

We already know by heart this scenario of the great fall but what this Heavenletter is bringing is the real possibility of changing even the physical scenario of the planet. Could we, by setting the inner workings of our heart to giving and spreading happiness, reverse the scenario of human density and restitute the pristineness of the Garden of Eden? Will we leave our bodies or will our bodies transform according to the laws of reality instead of the laws of illusion? It might be a new way to wind up the world and make it run. Thinking back to the future.

freedom

On February 25th, 2011 me (not verified) says:

when i read your post it reminded me of something i said in prayer.
I was talking to Dad (God) and i remember saying, " you know, i think you just want people to enjoy themselves."
As soon as i said this i heard, " I want people to be free to enjoy themselves."

Which came first: the EGGE OR CHICKEN, the World or you?

On February 25th, 2011 George Mon... says:

To even pose these questions takes us into the realm of dualism, of God and other.

God is ALL and in ALL. There is nothing that God is not, no place is outside God.

The World and God are the same thing.

Looking deep inside we find the Kingdom of God. In the Kingdom of God we find all that is or ever was. Because it all happens in NOW which is an instant of all, everything, we learn in the songs of silence who we have alway been. There's nothing else.

George

You make the world happen

On February 25th, 2011 Jochen (not verified) says:

The world is as I see it. What else is there to say? The world is as lovely as it is loved. This is hard science, so why think about anything, why think about ego or time and space, the nature of reality, oneness? Sometimes all of these topics and discussions look rather academic to me, as if we were buying time. Time for what? More deliberation? More postponing?

On the other hand, Heavenletters are addressing those "academic" topics all the time, which means there must be some purpose they do serve. Is it to make us think? I like to think of Heavenletters as energetic massages that only have to be sponged up. A little thinking is probably useful for agility. Too much of it is sidetracking.

The light you shine on the world casts its light on you. The shadows you cast on the world cast their shadows on you. What could be more straightforward? It seems there is no more time for me to buy. Time is pretty much sold out. Or maybe it's getting too expensive after too much demand. So, er, what about love?

Jochen sees through the light and the shadow.

On February 25th, 2011 George Mon... says:

Of Heaven Letters Jochen snaps our head back with: " I like to think of Heavenletters as energetic massages that only have to be sponged up. A little thinking is probably useful for agility. Too much of it is sidetracking."

Without sidetracking you, Jochen, move our consciousness higher and higher with your brilliant thinking. This opens the door to love. Thanks sweet friend.

George

God's academic topics and massages

On February 26th, 2011 Normand Bo... says:

What if God's recurrent academic topics were not His way of bringing us to a single perception, beyond opposites? A single perception which is His perception.

There is always light behind God's way of bringing contrasting ideas together. It is the light that brings His peace of mind to us. This is a healing light because it brings single perception, based upon one frame of reference, from which comes One meaning. God's frame of reference makes ours look like a building struggling to stand still under an earthquake of a magnitude well beyond Richter's scale. Unless it is a very powerful thai massage.

As for Love, isn't it giving the best of what we know we are? That is how God created us.That is His frame of reference.

reference

On February 26th, 2011 Jochen (not verified) says:

Normand, is the "not" in your first sentence okay? Anyway, I would answer that yes, "single perception" is most certainly what we are moving toward. But since we seem to know this increasingly well, I sometimes wonder why we are exercising our dualistic reasoning mind way beyound its usefulness. Using it can be fun, of course. It can also be a sign of hesitation or buying time. Don't get me wrong, I'm not making suggestions, just scratching my head. If we feel comfortable with "contrasting ideas", I think that's absolutely fine. For me, the whole concept of "reference" is somehow crumbling, and I know that what lies ahead is referenceless free fall aka love. So, all my questions and ponderings are strictly my own, of course. But I'm also looking around to see whether someone shares my perception.

"not"

On February 26th, 2011 Normand Bo... says:

In french, we can use both the affirmative and negative form in that case. Perhaps, in English, it has to be only affirmative. So yes, you can remove the "not".

"What if God's recurrent

On February 26th, 2011 Gloria Wen... says:

"What if God's recurrent academic topics were not His way of bringing us to a single perception, beyond opposites?"

Beloved Normand and Jochen, in English it is just fine too to use the negative. It's often done in questions. "Is it not too cold today?" What if death of the body were not painful for us?"

Jochen, is this not the case in the German language?

I love discussions of language.

I just started to proof a

On February 26th, 2011 Gloria Wen... says:

I just started to proof a Heavenletter, and what did I see?

"What if you are not here on Earth for yourself?"

Dear Gloria, the "not" is

On February 26th, 2011 Jochen (not verified) says:

Dear Gloria, the "not" is perfectly intelligible in all the examples you are giving, just not in Normand's sentence.

 

Hey friends! We're doing our best to keep this website alive. Every contribution helps. Please consider sending us support through Paypal. Thank you